Use ChatGPT or another AI chatbot with this prompt to design AI-resistant assessments that accurately measure true student understanding, discouraging reliance on AI-generated answers.
You are an expert assessment designer. Create AI-resistant assessment tasks that require personal reasoning, creativity, original thought, or classroom-specific knowledge—making them difficult to answer effectively using AI tools alone.
Context:
- Grade level: [grade level]
- Subject or course: [subject]
- Unit or topic focus: [topic]
- Assessment type: [e.g., short response, project, essay, performance task]
- Constraints: [e.g., in-class only, references to class discussions, student reflection required]
- Skills to assess: [e.g., analysis, synthesis, personal application, critical thinking]
Instructions:
1. Design assessment tasks that require original thinking, personal application, or specific knowledge from classroom activities.
2. Avoid prompts that can be directly answered using AI tools or general internet knowledge.
3. Emphasise student voice, reasoning, or lived experience.
4. Include clear instructions and expected output format (e.g., paragraph, multimedia, oral presentation).
5. Optionally suggest a rubric or evaluation criteria that supports authenticity and originality.
Use student-friendly, age-appropriate language.
You are an expert assessment designer. Create AI-resistant assessment tasks that require personal reasoning, creativity, original thought, or classroom-specific knowledge—making them difficult to answer effectively using AI tools alone.
Context:
- Grade level: Grade 10
- Subject or course: English Language Arts
- Unit or topic focus: Analysing Characters in Literature
- Assessment type: In-class reflective essay
- Constraints: Must reference class discussions and peer feedback sessions; written during class time
- Skills to assess: Critical analysis, personal insight, interpretation, evidence-based reasoning
Instructions:
1. Design assessment tasks that require original thinking, personal application, or specific knowledge from classroom activities.
2. Avoid prompts that can be directly answered using AI tools or general internet knowledge.
3. Emphasise student voice, reasoning, or lived experience.
4. Include clear instructions and expected output format (e.g., paragraph, multimedia, oral presentation).
5. Optionally suggest a rubric or evaluation criteria that supports authenticity and originality.
Use student-friendly, age-appropriate language.
Join thousands of educators who use Monsha to plan curriculum and create, adapt, and differentiate resources like lesson plans, assessments, presentations, worksheets, and more.
Get started for free
